Marco,
I don't see the attachment (except for the figures). Can you trying posting it again?
--Michael
machine correction, optimization and statistics
Moderators: cyao, michael_borland
-
- Posts: 1959
- Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
- Location: Argonne National Laboratory
- Contact:
Re: machine correction, optimization and statistics
Sorry Michael
my mistake I think, sure I had put it. I am attaching it now
Marco
my mistake I think, sure I had put it. I am attaching it now
Marco
- Attachments
-
- ERRORS_MISALIGNMENTS3.tar.gz
- (75.31 KiB) Downloaded 335 times
-
- Posts: 1959
- Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
- Location: Argonne National Laboratory
- Contact:
Re: machine correction, optimization and statistics
Marco,
I correct the closure of the ring to higher accuracy,but it didn't help.
I also found a CSBEND with SYNCH_RAD=1, in spite of the presence of an SREFFECTS element. This didn't solve the problem either.
Next, I reduced the number of misalignments to DX and DY on the QF elements, then use QFs for steering. The orbit was corrected to much smaller levels, basically zero at the BPMs. My conclusion is that there are too many error sources for the limited number of correctors you have.
--Michael
I correct the closure of the ring to higher accuracy,but it didn't help.
I also found a CSBEND with SYNCH_RAD=1, in spite of the presence of an SREFFECTS element. This didn't solve the problem either.
Next, I reduced the number of misalignments to DX and DY on the QF elements, then use QFs for steering. The orbit was corrected to much smaller levels, basically zero at the BPMs. My conclusion is that there are too many error sources for the limited number of correctors you have.
--Michael
- Attachments
-
- closeRing.ele
- (851 Bytes) Downloaded 362 times
Re: machine correction, optimization and statistics
Thanks a lot Michael to look into this. It is an interesting finding and I need to understand it in detail.
Marco
Marco
Re: machine correction, optimization and statistics
Indeed your conclusion is correct. I have double checked with AT2 and the absence of one VCM at the head of the achromat is responsible for the residual seen in the vertical plane. So thanks again to check this, it was very instructive