fiducialization and concat_order

Moderators: michael_borland, soliday

Post Reply
Alea88
Posts: 9
Joined: 05 Feb 2016, 08:27

fiducialization and concat_order

Post by Alea88 » 09 Jun 2016, 04:45

Dear all,
I 'd like to report that I noticed that concat_order switch in &run_setup seems to conflict with the first_is_fiducial switch in &run_control .

You can double check by adding concat_order=1 in the examples in bunchComp : both phaseSweep.ele and energySweep.ele show the error "problem with fiducialization. Seek expert help!"

I hope this is a useful information,
regards,
Giovanna

michael_borland
Posts: 1959
Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
Location: Argonne National Laboratory
Contact:

Re: fiducialization and concat_order

Post by michael_borland » 09 Jun 2016, 16:49

Giovanna,

Thanks for reporting this.

We'll see if we can fix it for the next release.

--Michael

Post Reply