a minus sign difference in ZImag of csrImpedance
Posted: 05 Apr 2015, 20:46
Dear all,
I am not sure if I misunderstand some information.
When I try to use "csrImpedance" to produce shielding CSR impedance with parallel-plate model, I found the imaginary part of the generated results have a minus-sign difference compared with the analytical expression (where I think ELEGANT uses Eq.(A1)-(A3) of Agoh, http://journals.aps.org/prstab/pdf/10.1 ... B.7.054403).
Is this just a bug or a different definition used in ELEGANT?
Thanks!
Cheng-Ying
I am not sure if I misunderstand some information.
When I try to use "csrImpedance" to produce shielding CSR impedance with parallel-plate model, I found the imaginary part of the generated results have a minus-sign difference compared with the analytical expression (where I think ELEGANT uses Eq.(A1)-(A3) of Agoh, http://journals.aps.org/prstab/pdf/10.1 ... B.7.054403).
Is this just a bug or a different definition used in ELEGANT?
Thanks!
Cheng-Ying