I use the attached lattice to compute twiss parameters.
I get a unsymmetry result, but the lattice has symmetry layout.
I don't know the reason.
Why twiss doea not symmetry?
Moderators: cyao, michael_borland
Why twiss doea not symmetry?
- Attachments
-
- TWISS.rar
- (1.29 KiB) Downloaded 207 times
-
michael_borland
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
- Location: Argonne National Laboratory
- Contact:
Re: Why twiss doea not symmetry?
Can you post the files in a different format? I don't have any software that will extract files from a RAR file.
tar and zip formats are more universal.
--Michael
tar and zip formats are more universal.
--Michael
Re: Why twiss doea not symmetry?
Can this file be opened?
Thanks a lot!
Thanks a lot!
- Attachments
-
- TWISS.zip
- (1.38 KiB) Downloaded 218 times
-
michael_borland
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
- Location: Argonne National Laboratory
- Contact:
Re: Why twiss doea not symmetry?
Shancai,
The lattice layout is symmetric, but the quadrupole strengths are not. To get a symmetric solution, Q1, Q2, and Q3, must have the same strength as Q8, Q7, and Q6, respectively.
If you make a new beamline like this:
twosec: line=(onesp,-onesp)
you'll find it has symmetric lattice functions.
--Michael
The lattice layout is symmetric, but the quadrupole strengths are not. To get a symmetric solution, Q1, Q2, and Q3, must have the same strength as Q8, Q7, and Q6, respectively.
If you make a new beamline like this:
twosec: line=(onesp,-onesp)
you'll find it has symmetric lattice functions.
--Michael