Hello,
I calculated momentum aperture, ibs emittances with ibsEmittance and Touschek lifetime with touschekLifetime.
Then I plotted momentum aperture and square root of tmP and tmN, which look different from momentum aperture on attached figure. The difference is clearly visible while comparing the mmap and tlife files. The number of elements is identical.
Why is the difference? It looks like there is a some type of smoothing.
The second question is an attempt to understand the loss rate plot. The peak at s=588 m has minimum of H and minimum of dispersion comparing with immediate surrounding. What is the reason for the peak?
The beam energy is 1.5 GeV. I am using "elegant 2021.4.0 Nov 18 2021".
I attached the sorted mmap, tlife, and twi files.
Thank you,
Anton
Discrepancy between momentum aperture and Touschek
Moderators: cyao, michael_borland

 Posts: 18
 Joined: 29 Jan 2021, 14:07
Discrepancy between momentum aperture and Touschek
 Attachments

 2021.12.2108.21.09_1.0crab1.5GeV8cav.zip
 (523.13 KiB) Downloaded 80 times

 Posts: 1772
 Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
 Location: Argonne National Laboratory
 Contact:
Re: Discrepancy between momentum aperture and Touschek
Anton,
I can't reproduce your results. For this energy, sqrt(tmP) and sqrt(tmN) are deltaPositive and deltaNegative. If I plot those, the agreement is essentially perfect. The FN and FP columns are misleading, since they are not integrated vs s. If you do that, the spike doesn't look so significant. For this plot, I normalized FN and FP to the circumference, then integrated vs s, so the units are 1/s.
Michael
I can't reproduce your results. For this energy, sqrt(tmP) and sqrt(tmN) are deltaPositive and deltaNegative. If I plot those, the agreement is essentially perfect. The FN and FP columns are misleading, since they are not integrated vs s. If you do that, the spike doesn't look so significant. For this plot, I normalized FN and FP to the circumference, then integrated vs s, so the units are 1/s.
Michael

 Posts: 18
 Joined: 29 Jan 2021, 14:07
Re: Discrepancy between momentum aperture and Touschek
Thank you, Michael,
It is puzzling. I read sdds files into python pandas and plot them. The difference is obvious.
I also converted sdds files into ascii (both files are in the new attachment)
and compare mmap and tlife for element and the difference is visible
L2.MQ23 (s = 8.198064599999999e+01)
in mmap: deltaPositive = 5.000000000000000e03
in tlife: tmP =5.424767157239484e05 and the square root is sqrt(5.424767157239484e05) = 0.0073653018656668
R1.MQ20 (s = 4.444997969999995e+02)
in mmap: deltaPositive = 1.4e2
in tlife: tmP = 1.575137583744795e04 and the square root is sqrt(1.575137583744795e04) = 0.01255044853280071
For this energy
beta=math.sqrt(1  ((me_mks * c_mks * c_mks) / (e_mks * 1.5e9))**2 ) = 0.9999999419733219
and doesn't change much.
Even if I use sdds tools to create new columns sqrt_tmP and sqrt_tmN I still get the same results
I use SDDS_ToolKitx64.msi version 5.1
Integration of FP and FN is a good comment. I will implement this.
Anton
It is puzzling. I read sdds files into python pandas and plot them. The difference is obvious.
I also converted sdds files into ascii (both files are in the new attachment)
Code: Select all
sddsconvert ascii results/ct_ring.tlife results/ct_ting.tlife.ascii
sddsconvert ascii results/ct_ring.mmap.sorted results/ct_ring.mmap.sorted.ascii
L2.MQ23 (s = 8.198064599999999e+01)
in mmap: deltaPositive = 5.000000000000000e03
in tlife: tmP =5.424767157239484e05 and the square root is sqrt(5.424767157239484e05) = 0.0073653018656668
R1.MQ20 (s = 4.444997969999995e+02)
in mmap: deltaPositive = 1.4e2
in tlife: tmP = 1.575137583744795e04 and the square root is sqrt(1.575137583744795e04) = 0.01255044853280071
For this energy
beta=math.sqrt(1  ((me_mks * c_mks * c_mks) / (e_mks * 1.5e9))**2 ) = 0.9999999419733219
and doesn't change much.
Even if I use sdds tools to create new columns sqrt_tmP and sqrt_tmN I still get the same results
Code: Select all
sddsprocess results/ct_ring.tlife pipe=out \
define=col,sqrt_tmP,"tmP sqrt" \
define=col,sqrt_tmN,"tmN sqrt" \
 sddsconvert pipe=in results/ct_ring.tlife_new
!sddsconvert ascii results/ct_ring.tlife_new results/ct_ting.tlife_new.ascii
Integration of FP and FN is a good comment. I will implement this.
Anton
 Attachments

 2021.12.2108.21.09_1.0crab1.5GeV8cav.zip
 (1.1 MiB) Downloaded 83 times

 Posts: 7
 Joined: 14 Apr 2021, 09:42
 Location: Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (BINP), Novosibirsk, RF
Re: Discrepancy between momentum aperture and Touschek
Michael,
I have reproduced the problem mentioned above by Anton with different lattice. Maybe the problem is in touschekLifetime program?
Here is version of the program I am using on Windows:
I have reproduced the problem mentioned above by Anton with different lattice. Maybe the problem is in touschekLifetime program?
Here is version of the program I am using on Windows:
Code: Select all
Program by A. Xiao, M. Borland. (This is version 8, March 2017, M. Borland)
Last bumped by Skamarokha on 03 Jun 2022, 03:28.
Respectfully,
Mikhail A. Skamarokha.
Mikhail A. Skamarokha.