chromaticity calculations
Posted: 25 Sep 2011, 13:03
Dear Michael,
How are you? Can you help me to figure out what happens when i calculate the chromaticities? The situation is following.
First of all, I have to claim that I use elegant for a proton ring with energy 60GeV. Therefore, I give "&change_particle name=proton &end" in the beginning of .ele file.
No sextupoles at this moment. I have an .lte file which bends are set as "sben", quads are "quad". I used the default_order=3 and concat_order=3. So I could get the natural chromacities from up to the 3rd order matrices, am I right? What I get was (-319.6, -396.9). However, occasionally, I set "sben" to "csbend" and "quad" to "kquad" in the .lte file (using the canonical elements definition). I was still using the same .ele file, it came out chromaticities (-319.6,-393.3), a 0.75% discrepancy in the vertical direction. You may say such a trivial off is acceptable. The problem is when I use two sextupoles families to correct this first order chromaticities, they make (-319.6, -396.9) to (0,0) exactly, but canonically get (0,+3). Actually, I do find this off-center when I plot nuy vs. dp/p after canonically tracking particles a few thousands turns. Therefore, this chromaticies were not corrected for off momentum particle, in stead of on momentum particle.
I compare this calculated chromaticities from MADX by using both matrices and PTC twiss. Both of them show (-319, -396) for a ring without sextupoles. I also find some discrepancy for an electron ring lattice. So could you please explain to me where I made mistake and how elegant obtain the natural chromaticies?
Thank you so much!
Best,
Fanglei
How are you? Can you help me to figure out what happens when i calculate the chromaticities? The situation is following.
First of all, I have to claim that I use elegant for a proton ring with energy 60GeV. Therefore, I give "&change_particle name=proton &end" in the beginning of .ele file.
No sextupoles at this moment. I have an .lte file which bends are set as "sben", quads are "quad". I used the default_order=3 and concat_order=3. So I could get the natural chromacities from up to the 3rd order matrices, am I right? What I get was (-319.6, -396.9). However, occasionally, I set "sben" to "csbend" and "quad" to "kquad" in the .lte file (using the canonical elements definition). I was still using the same .ele file, it came out chromaticities (-319.6,-393.3), a 0.75% discrepancy in the vertical direction. You may say such a trivial off is acceptable. The problem is when I use two sextupoles families to correct this first order chromaticities, they make (-319.6, -396.9) to (0,0) exactly, but canonically get (0,+3). Actually, I do find this off-center when I plot nuy vs. dp/p after canonically tracking particles a few thousands turns. Therefore, this chromaticies were not corrected for off momentum particle, in stead of on momentum particle.
I compare this calculated chromaticities from MADX by using both matrices and PTC twiss. Both of them show (-319, -396) for a ring without sextupoles. I also find some discrepancy for an electron ring lattice. So could you please explain to me where I made mistake and how elegant obtain the natural chromaticies?
Thank you so much!
Best,
Fanglei