Inconsistent Results in Orbit Correction Testing
Posted: 07 Nov 2023, 20:13
Dear all,
I am currently using the correct command to test the closed orbit correction configuration in ELEGANT 2022-2-0. However, I have encountered an inconsistency between the *.scor, *.orb, and *.bpm results. This inconsistency appears to be limited to the horizontal information, as other statistical results for the vertical orbit and correctors are consistent.
For instance, as shown in the attached slide, the *scor file indicates that the final corrected Pmax is 0.7 µm, but the raw data for the x orbit shows Xmax to be approximately 400 µm. I have also attached my ele and lte files for your reference.
If you have any insights into what might be causing this issue and how I can correct it, I would greatly appreciate your valuable comments.
Thank you.
I am currently using the correct command to test the closed orbit correction configuration in ELEGANT 2022-2-0. However, I have encountered an inconsistency between the *.scor, *.orb, and *.bpm results. This inconsistency appears to be limited to the horizontal information, as other statistical results for the vertical orbit and correctors are consistent.
For instance, as shown in the attached slide, the *scor file indicates that the final corrected Pmax is 0.7 µm, but the raw data for the x orbit shows Xmax to be approximately 400 µm. I have also attached my ele and lte files for your reference.
If you have any insights into what might be causing this issue and how I can correct it, I would greatly appreciate your valuable comments.
Thank you.