Micro-bunching particle tracking

Moderators: cyao, michael_borland

Post Reply
Hwang, Ji-Gwang
Posts: 40
Joined: 21 Jan 2010, 02:27

Micro-bunching particle tracking

Post by Hwang, Ji-Gwang » 05 Aug 2010, 01:25

Dear Borland and every-body. :)

Hello. I simulate the linac tracking using real beam distribution.
This beam distribution get from injector simulation using parmela.
The bunch was micro-bunched by buncher cavities. This figure is attached.
It has 10% energy deviation with ~125 MeV.

General case, the momentum deviation has <0.05% at the end of Linac.
So, I make some optimization run.ele file for minimize the deviation. I attached it.
It contain the optimize the phase for the energy and deviation at the end of Linac.
But it has 3% momentum deviation after optimized.I think it is caused by the micro-bunched beam.
How to decrease the momentum deviation? and How to confirm the beam emittance of each slices?

Have a nice days. and Best regard.

From Hwang Ji-Gwang
Attachments
제목 없음.png
제목 없음.png (10.55 KiB) Viewed 7374 times
run.ele
run file for optimize
(6.52 KiB) Downloaded 800 times
latt.lte
lattice file
(8.22 KiB) Downloaded 829 times

michael_borland
Posts: 1933
Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
Location: Argonne National Laboratory
Contact:

Re: Micro-bunching particle tracking

Post by michael_borland » 10 Aug 2010, 09:49

Ji-Gwang,

Can you also post the input particle file?

--Michael

Hwang, Ji-Gwang
Posts: 40
Joined: 21 Jan 2010, 02:27

Re: Micro-bunching particle tracking

Post by Hwang, Ji-Gwang » 10 Aug 2010, 19:56

Dear Michael Borland

I attached the beam input file.

Sincerely yours

Hwang, Ji-Gwang
Attachments
Pre-injector.sdds
(390.18 KiB) Downloaded 810 times

michael_borland
Posts: 1933
Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
Location: Argonne National Laboratory
Contact:

Re: Micro-bunching particle tracking

Post by michael_borland » 12 Aug 2010, 13:33

Ji-Gwang,

The problem is not that you have a train of bunches, but that the individual bunches are too long to allow achieving the energy spread you want. You need an energy slit upstream of the linac to remove the low-energy tail, since it makes for a very long bunch.

In your input file, you allow all the phases to vary independently, but don't vary the voltages. This is very constrained since you are also targeting a specific final energy. You don't need to vary all the phases and voltages independently, however. Varying them in a ganged fashion is completely equivalent and much faster. (A sum of sine waves at a common frequency is equivalent to a single sine wave at the same frequency.) See the attached file.

--Michael
Attachments
run.ele
(10.13 KiB) Downloaded 856 times

Hwang, Ji-Gwang
Posts: 40
Joined: 21 Jan 2010, 02:27

Re: Micro-bunching particle tracking

Post by Hwang, Ji-Gwang » 26 Aug 2010, 09:55

Dear Michael Borland

Thanks for your reply. I agree with your opinion.
So, I attached the "PFILTER" element at the upstream of the linac.
But The bunch distribution at the end of linac has still long tail. So, I will test many things.

Have a nice day.

From Hwang Ji-Gwang

Post Reply