Dear Elegant experts,
when I designed an achromatic lattice, there are big difference results between KQUAD and QUAD lattice with "default_order=3". Although, two lattice have same "etay" (*.twi) , the simulation results with QUAD-lattice looks good, but the simulation results with KQUAD-lattice show that the R36 sames not zero (*.sig & *.out). The results and lattice file are presented as attachments. Could you give me some suggestions? Are there some unreasonable settings ?
Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Cai
Big difference results between KQUAD and QUAD
Moderators: cyao, michael_borland
Big difference results between KQUAD and QUAD
- Attachments
-
- Results.rar
- (25.39 KiB) Downloaded 507 times
-
- QUAD.rar
- (2.12 KiB) Downloaded 539 times
-
- KQUAD.rar
- (2.12 KiB) Downloaded 518 times
-
- Posts: 1959
- Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
- Location: Argonne National Laboratory
- Contact:
Re: Big difference results between KQUAD and QUAD
Cai,
You need to use more slices for the KQUAD elements to get accurate integration. The defaults are rarely sufficient.
Try changing
to
I did this and the agreement on s36 was essentially perfect.
--Michael
You need to use more slices for the KQUAD elements to get accurate integration. The defaults are rarely sufficient.
Try changing
Code: Select all
KQUAD,...
Code: Select all
KQUAD,INTEGRATION_ORDER=6,N_SLICES=10,...
--Michael
Re: Big difference results between KQUAD and QUAD
Hi Michael,
Thanks very much! It does work after increasing the value "N_KICKS".
Best regards,
Cai
Thanks very much! It does work after increasing the value "N_KICKS".
Best regards,
Cai