Dear Michael,
I have a question regarding the longitudinal behavior I observe in ELEGANT simulations.
I compared two versions of the same lattice:
Case 1: Four dipoles active (first dipole with a 5° bend) → R56 ≈ 1.9×10⁻⁶, bunch length ≈ 149 µm.
Case 2: All dipole bending angles set to 0°, but the septum and kicker remain active → R56 ≈ 9.8×10⁻³, bunch length ≈ 96 µm.
The energy spread (Δp/p = 10⁻³) is identical in both cases, so I would expect a longer bunch for the larger R56 (three orders of magnitude higher). However, the opposite occurs. Could you please help me understand why this happens?
In addition, I noticed that even when varying the beam energy from 90 MeV up to 1 GeV, the final bunch length remains almost unchanged. It seems that ELEGANT may be assuming β ≈ 1 (particle velocity equal to the speed of light).
Is this β≈1 assumption still valid at 90 MeV, or could it introduce a noticeable error in the longitudinal dynamics, such as in the bunch length or R56 effects?
Thank you very much in advance for your time and clarification.
Best regards,
Samira Fatehi
Longitudinal behavior- Bendings_on/off
Moderators: cyao, michael_borland
-
samira.fatehi
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 03 Dec 2021, 12:39
- Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
- Contact:
Longitudinal behavior- Bendings_on/off
- Attachments
-
- Bendsoff.lte
- (3.65 KiB) Downloaded 48 times
-
- fin_all_on.txt
- (4.27 KiB) Downloaded 48 times
-
- fin-Bends_off.txt
- (4.27 KiB) Downloaded 44 times
-
michael_borland
- Posts: 2020
- Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
- Location: Argonne National Laboratory
- Contact:
Re: Longitudinal behavior- Bendings_on/off
Samira,
It is hard to comment without having the input particle distribution. If it has a time-momentum correlation of the right sign, then having larger R56 could easily result in a shorter bunch.
Also, be careful to look at St rather than Ss. As explained here, Ss is the spread in distance traveled, while St is the spread in arrival time.
Elegant does not assume beta=1. However, even for 90 MeV, beta=0.99998..., which is close enough to 1 that you shouldn't see much effect.
--Michael
It is hard to comment without having the input particle distribution. If it has a time-momentum correlation of the right sign, then having larger R56 could easily result in a shorter bunch.
Also, be careful to look at St rather than Ss. As explained here, Ss is the spread in distance traveled, while St is the spread in arrival time.
Elegant does not assume beta=1. However, even for 90 MeV, beta=0.99998..., which is close enough to 1 that you shouldn't see much effect.
--Michael