Longitudinal behavior- Bendings_on/off

Moderators: cyao, michael_borland

Post Reply
samira.fatehi
Posts: 3
Joined: 03 Dec 2021, 12:39
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Contact:

Longitudinal behavior- Bendings_on/off

Post by samira.fatehi » 08 Oct 2025, 04:04

Dear Michael,

I have a question regarding the longitudinal behavior I observe in ELEGANT simulations.

I compared two versions of the same lattice:

Case 1: Four dipoles active (first dipole with a 5° bend) → R56 ≈ 1.9×10⁻⁶, bunch length ≈ 149 µm.

Case 2: All dipole bending angles set to 0°, but the septum and kicker remain active → R56 ≈ 9.8×10⁻³, bunch length ≈ 96 µm.

The energy spread (Δp/p = 10⁻³) is identical in both cases, so I would expect a longer bunch for the larger R56 (three orders of magnitude higher). However, the opposite occurs. Could you please help me understand why this happens?

In addition, I noticed that even when varying the beam energy from 90 MeV up to 1 GeV, the final bunch length remains almost unchanged. It seems that ELEGANT may be assuming β ≈ 1 (particle velocity equal to the speed of light).

Is this β≈1 assumption still valid at 90 MeV, or could it introduce a noticeable error in the longitudinal dynamics, such as in the bunch length or R56 effects?

Thank you very much in advance for your time and clarification.

Best regards,
Samira Fatehi
Attachments
Bendsoff.lte
(3.65 KiB) Downloaded 48 times
fin_all_on.txt
(4.27 KiB) Downloaded 48 times
fin-Bends_off.txt
(4.27 KiB) Downloaded 44 times

michael_borland
Posts: 2020
Joined: 19 May 2008, 09:33
Location: Argonne National Laboratory
Contact:

Re: Longitudinal behavior- Bendings_on/off

Post by michael_borland » 27 Oct 2025, 12:25

Samira,

It is hard to comment without having the input particle distribution. If it has a time-momentum correlation of the right sign, then having larger R56 could easily result in a shorter bunch.

Also, be careful to look at St rather than Ss. As explained here, Ss is the spread in distance traveled, while St is the spread in arrival time.

Elegant does not assume beta=1. However, even for 90 MeV, beta=0.99998..., which is close enough to 1 that you shouldn't see much effect.

--Michael

Post Reply