Elegant users forum

Hello. There is an error in the sddspseudoinverse while I am trying to execute an example of "DATuneScan" with the recent version sdds-toolkit on the Windows machine. It works fine with the old-version sdds-toolkit.

Dear Micheal Borland I am sorry too poor my explanation. I will post the example as soon as possible. The kicker (MAL element) putted in the lattice file and modulation comment is on .ele file to give the time varying kick with certain frequency. And the frequency is the betatron sideband. Then I ob...

Dear Micheal Borland

Thanks! It is working.
I think the significant number in my code made this issue.
I will carefully make the field map with well defined significant number.

Best regards

Ji-Gwang Hwang

Dear Michael borland Hello. I would like to observe the beam orbit changing over 1 Million turns as a result of the energy variation due to the radiation damping by the large orbit oscillation when the excitation signal was given. Then, I put the CSBEND with radiation damping (USE_RAD_DIST=1) and RF...

Hello, Michael I tried to use the FTable for tracking simulation of the specific elements. The FTable input is made following the instruction and checked the field map file by "sddsprint". It looks fine. But it gives error message such as "error: L+L1+L2 != field length in file %s." even I don't ass...

Dear Michael Borland

Thans to your reply. I will try to check it.
Always thank you for your helpful reply.

Have a nice day. Best regards.

Hwang,Ji-Gwang

Dear Michael Borland

I'm post it. Please check.

Sincerely yours.

From Hwang, Ji-Gwang

Dear Michael Borland

I'm post it. Please check.

Sincerely yours.

From Hwang, Ji-Gwang

Dear Michael Borland Thank for your reply. I have two lattice file. One is bare lattice with 11 mm vertical gap. Other contain the undulator with 6mm vertical gap. The second result get from second lattice with 20 undulator. I attached it. I think that it is relate with twenty undulator. Because the...

Dear Michael Borland Hello. Thank you. I check the result. The result is same. Sorry. I confuse the result by the color code. But I still has one more question. The file of "6mm with ID.pdf" has little strange result. When I simulate the ring with 20 ID, 256 turns and 6mm insertion devies gap, the F...