- Use the element_divisions parameter of the run_setup command.
- Use the divide_elements command.
Search found 1798 matches
- 19 Sep 2022, 15:16
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: Setting CWIGGLER
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3706
Re: Setting CWIGGLER
Using the subdivision feature in CWIGGLER is the same as other elements. You have two options
- 19 Sep 2022, 13:25
- Forum: General
- Topic: Arbitary charge per bunch with arbitary macro-particles per bunch?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1761
Re: Arbitary charge per bunch with arbitary macro-particles per bunch?
Seb, There's some infrastructure in elegant to support variable weighting of simulation particles. However, implementing it consistently across the code is a big job that I haven't found time to take on. For example, you'll note in track.h there is a definition of a quantity weightIndex. This gives ...
- 19 Sep 2022, 13:22
- Forum: Optimization and Matching
- Topic: Beta Beating Correction in presence of errors
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4342
Re: Beta Beating Correction in presence of errors
Sara,
Thanks for your post!
--Michael
Thanks for your post!
--Michael
- 19 Sep 2022, 13:21
- Forum: Linac Tracking
- Topic: Parameters
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2367
Re: Parameters
I'm not sure what you mean, but perhaps you refer to the lattice parameter in the &run_setup command. That parameter names the file that defines the lattice (the layout of magnets and other components).
In that particular example, the file is called lattice.lte
--Michael
In that particular example, the file is called lattice.lte
--Michael
- 19 Sep 2022, 13:18
- Forum: General
- Topic: Wake field and impedance estimation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1188
Re: Wake field and impedance estimation
You can simulate the effect of impedance on the beam. To actually determine the impedance, you need to use another code, e.g., GDFIDL, CST, ECHO, ABCI, ...
--Michael
--Michael
- 19 Sep 2022, 13:14
- Forum: General
- Topic: Particles fly off to huge trajectories - any ideas?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2683
Re: Particles fly off to huge trajectories - any ideas?
Looking at your files, I don't see any obvious problems. A few things to try: More particles, to see if it is something real or just statistics. Reduce the sigma span of the random number generator used for synchrotron radiation, e.g., &global_settings SR_gaussian_limit = 2 &end I suspect that there...
- 19 Sep 2022, 12:07
- Forum: General
- Topic: Implementation of bunch lengthning and transverse impedance
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7455
Re: Implementation of bunch lengthning and transverse impedance
Sara,
Yes, I would agree with your conclusions. I'd suggest finer steps in charge at the low end to ensure you aren't underestimating the threshold, which seems quite low.
--Michael
Yes, I would agree with your conclusions. I'd suggest finer steps in charge at the low end to ensure you aren't underestimating the threshold, which seems quite low.
--Michael
- 02 Aug 2022, 11:16
- Forum: General
- Topic: Implementation of bunch lengthning and transverse impedance
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7455
Re: Implementation of bunch lengthning and transverse impedance
Sara,
Unless the handles reappear, I wouldn't consider that MWI. It may just be the bunch settling into the rf bucket that is distorted by potential well distortion.
--Michael
Unless the handles reappear, I wouldn't consider that MWI. It may just be the bunch settling into the rf bucket that is distorted by potential well distortion.
--Michael
- 02 Aug 2022, 09:43
- Forum: Optimization and Matching
- Topic: close orbit and response matrix when random error exist?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1351
Re: close orbit and response matrix when random error exist?
Chao, The coupled trajectory correction requires that only HMON and VMON elements are present in the beamline, so I converted your lattice. The attached files work for trajectory correction, but the tune correction isn't stable. Is this a ring that is strongly coupled, or a transport line? The coupl...
- 02 Aug 2022, 09:26
- Forum: General
- Topic: Implementation of bunch lengthning and transverse impedance
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7455
Re: Implementation of bunch lengthning and transverse impedance
Sara,
I'd suggest using more particles and finer spacing of the points in current. I'd hope that will give a clearer threshold.
--Michael
I'd suggest using more particles and finer spacing of the points in current. I'd hope that will give a clearer threshold.
--Michael