Search found 60 matches
- 07 Feb 2013, 22:37
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: alter_elements, quads, and matrices
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3363
Re: alter_elements, quads, and matrices
Specifically, it seems to change K1=0.2959427141 to K1=0.28913603221540796 when I asked for K1=0.977. If you look at the first element, either in the binary file or the ascii file, it comes out with R11=0.964075, which corresponds to the K1=0.289136..., as long as I'm assuming that L=0.5. If I chang...
- 07 Feb 2013, 22:28
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: alter_elements, quads, and matrices
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3363
- 07 Feb 2013, 22:23
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: alter_elements, quads, and matrices
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3363
alter_elements, quads, and matrices
Hey all, This seems like an odd bug. I'm using a pretty simple line with a few quads. Without alter_elements, the K1 value I give my quads returns the correct matrix in the printed matrix file. When I turn on alter_elements in order to change the K1 value of the quads, it appears to change the K1 va...
- 02 Nov 2012, 14:39
- Forum: General
- Topic: SDDS Python Demo Fails
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2321
Re: SDDS Python Demo Fails
That looks great! Thanks for helping.
- 02 Nov 2012, 13:49
- Forum: General
- Topic: SDDS Python Demo Fails
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2321
Re: SDDS Python Demo Fails
It's better... no errors, but the file is written incorrectly. I'm running on RedHat: =============================================================================== RHEL Workstation 6.3 (Santiago) 2.6.32-279.5.2.el6.x86_64 (4x2992MHz OptiPlex 960) ===================================================...
- 01 Nov 2012, 17:09
- Forum: General
- Topic: SDDS Python Demo Fails
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2321
Re: SDDS Python Demo Fails
It seems to have the same problem with characters in columns. The save functionality just seems to be really broken. Is this true? Or is it just me?
- 01 Nov 2012, 16:55
- Forum: General
- Topic: SDDS Python Demo Fails
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2321
SDDS Python Demo Fails
Hey all, I can't seem to get the SDDS Python Demo function to work. I'm diving into the source, but I'm new to the Python C API, so it's slow. So far I've traced the problem to sddsdata.SetParameter(x.index,page,value) where value is a string. Whenever I ask that function to return a value it gives ...
- 01 Oct 2012, 17:25
- Forum: General
- Topic: Extract SDDS Page Efficiently
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3755
Re: Extract SDDS Page Efficiently
Okay, too quick to speak. I don't think this will be a problem for me now because I'm not looking at integers, but it's strange. I'm including the code you'll need to replicate the problem. The first run through, I believe before it compiles .pyc files, it has errors reading the second column in pag...
- 01 Oct 2012, 13:29
- Forum: General
- Topic: Extract SDDS Page Efficiently
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3755
Re: Extract SDDS Page Efficiently
Ohhhhh, awesome, this is exactly the information I was looking for. Thanks! I think this can be called closed now.
- 28 Sep 2012, 16:57
- Forum: General
- Topic: Extract SDDS Page Efficiently
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3755
Re: Extract SDDS Page Efficiently
Thanks for the code, I'll see if I can make it work.
Question: So (sparse_offset >= 0)? Not (sparse_offset > 0)? Is this the same with sparse_interval?
Question: So (sparse_offset >= 0)? Not (sparse_offset > 0)? Is this the same with sparse_interval?