Search found 2005 matches
- 16 Apr 2025, 15:13
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Possible bug in IBSCATTER writing output
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5470
Re: Possible bug in IBSCATTER writing output
Phia, For a single-step run, the individual files will be for specific s locations of the IBSCATTER element. Each file will have NSLICES pages. Within each page, you'll find data for the end of each element between this IBSCATTER element and that last. How you combine the files depends on how you wa...
- 16 Apr 2025, 11:18
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: K1 in SBEN and CSBEND is ignored if ANGLE=0
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2214
Re: K1 in SBEN and CSBEND is ignored if ANGLE=0
Mikhail,
You are correct that there is a bug when the angle is very small. If you build from source, the attached files contain the fix. Otherwise, the fix will appear in the next version.
Thanks for reporting this bug.
--Michael
You are correct that there is a bug when the angle is very small. If you build from source, the attached files contain the fix. Otherwise, the fix will appear in the next version.
Thanks for reporting this bug.
--Michael
- 14 Apr 2025, 12:05
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Possible bug in IBSCATTER writing output
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5470
Re: Possible bug in IBSCATTER writing output
Phia,
Sorry that the manual page is a little unclear. You need to specify a different FILENAME value for each IBSCATTER element. Otherwise, the last one will overwrite the others.
--Michael
Sorry that the manual page is a little unclear. You need to specify a different FILENAME value for each IBSCATTER element. Otherwise, the last one will overwrite the others.
--Michael
- 14 Apr 2025, 12:03
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Wildcards and type parameter for vary_element
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5187
Re: Wildcards and type parameter for vary_element
Mikhail,
I'll look into adding that. Meanwhile, you can use the link_elements feature to reduce the inconvenience.
--Michael
I'll look into adding that. Meanwhile, you can use the link_elements feature to reduce the inconvenience.
--Michael
- 14 Apr 2025, 12:00
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: K1 in SBEN and CSBEND is ignored if ANGLE=0
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2214
Re: K1 in SBEN and CSBEND is ignored if ANGLE=0
Mikhail,
If you look at the detailed warning message (earlier in the log file), it should say that it is treated as a KQUAD but that higher-order multipoles are ignored. (This limitation is because of differences in how KQUAD and CSBEND specify higher multipoles.)
--Michael
If you look at the detailed warning message (earlier in the log file), it should say that it is treated as a KQUAD but that higher-order multipoles are ignored. (This limitation is because of differences in how KQUAD and CSBEND specify higher multipoles.)
--Michael
- 14 Apr 2025, 11:56
- Forum: Optimization and Matching
- Topic: Multi-objective direct optimization of DA and MA
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4738
Re: Multi-objective direct optimization of DA and MA
It is hard to say without more details, but a possible cause is that the required files are not created by the jobs. Do you see the final processed output files, which should have extension .proc? Any errors in the individual log files?
--Michael
--Michael
- 14 Apr 2025, 11:52
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Version 2025.1 released
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1340
Version 2025.1 released
Version 2025.1 of elegant has been released. This is mostly a bug-fix release.
Details are available here.
--Michael
Details are available here.
--Michael
- 14 Apr 2025, 11:52
- Forum: General
- Topic: Version 2025.1 released
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1551
Version 2025.1 released
Version 2025.1 of elegant has been released. This is mostly a bug-fix release.
Details are available here.
--Michael
Details are available here.
--Michael
- 10 Mar 2025, 18:57
- Forum: Parallel Elegant
- Topic: Pelegant &sdds_beam issue
- Replies: 1
- Views: 15868
Re: Pelegant &sdds_beam issue
I tried this and it ran without any issues on Pelegant. Is there another filesystem you can try?
Which operating system are you using?
--Michael
Which operating system are you using?
--Michael
- 10 Mar 2025, 18:53
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: Multi-bunch Instability Simulations
- Replies: 3
- Views: 51787
Re: Multi-bunch Instability Simulations
Some possible sources of the problem: 1. You are not setting the START_PID and END_PID parameters on the WATCH elements correctly, so you are seeing the length computed over several bunches. 2. You have one or more particles outside the rf bucket, so that those particles deviation from the centroid ...