Search found 51 matches
- 31 Jan 2021, 22:27
- Forum: General
- Topic: Unable to access file --file is locked (SDDS_InitializeOutput)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6556
Unable to access file --file is locked (SDDS_InitializeOutput)
Hi Michael, I'm using SLURM to submit elegant/Pelegant jobs on a cluster, inside the bash script there is a sddsprocess command that generate a new file out of an old file. But when the script is executed, sometimes( not always ) there is the following error message: Error for sddsprocess: Unable to...
- 11 Jan 2021, 21:49
- Forum: General
- Topic: A question about divide_elements
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5729
Re: A question about divide_elements
OK, thanks, Michael.
Zhe
Zhe
- 10 Jan 2021, 21:25
- Forum: General
- Topic: A question about divide_elements
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5729
A question about divide_elements
Hi Michael, I'd like to split a CSBEND into several slices using divide_elements. If I use save_lattice then only one instance of the slice with the same name of the original CSBEND element appears in the new lattice file, its length and angle are divided by divisions but E1 & E2 remain the same, re...
- 27 Sep 2020, 05:39
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Some mechanism to rotate a ring lattice
- Replies: 3
- Views: 15531
Re: Some mechanism to rotate a ring lattice
Hi Michael, One thing still not clear to me, is how the closed_orbit command treats a rotated ring using a BRANCH element like the following syntax: M0: MARK M1: MARK BR1: BRANCH, BRANCH_TO="M0", ELSE_TO="M1", counter=1, DEFAULT_TO_ELSE=1 RING: LINE=( BR1, M0, PART1, M1, PART2 ) I would like to calc...
- 20 Sep 2020, 05:11
- Forum: General
- Topic: Aperture for EHKICKER, EHKICK, EVKICK
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4945
Re: Aperture for EHKICKER, EHKICK, EVKICK
Hi Youssef, I think the reason is that the introduction of EHKICKER changes the closed orbit, and when ELEGANT computes xApertures and yApertures it takes into account the local closed orbit deviation, i.e., when a particle arrives at a specific point in the ring, if the local closed orbit is nonzer...
- 17 Jul 2020, 01:42
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: One issue with PHASE_REFERENCE of the RFCA element
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8662
Re: One issue with PHASE_REFERENCE of the RFCA element
Hi Michael,
Thanks! This did solve the strange large value of PHASE_REFERENCE when dumping the lattice.
Best,
Zhe
Thanks! This did solve the strange large value of PHASE_REFERENCE when dumping the lattice.
Best,
Zhe
- 17 Jul 2020, 01:04
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: One issue with PHASE_REFERENCE of the RFCA element
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8662
Re: One issue with PHASE_REFERENCE of the RFCA element
Hi Michael,
I use PAR ring as an illustration, see attached files. I used both a MAC and a linux server, the results are the same.
Best,
Zhe
I use PAR ring as an illustration, see attached files. I used both a MAC and a linux server, the results are the same.
Best,
Zhe
- 04 Jul 2020, 22:14
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: One issue with PHASE_REFERENCE of the RFCA element
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8662
One issue with PHASE_REFERENCE of the RFCA element
Hi Michael, I was trying to modify the RFCA elements in one .ele script and dump the modified lattice with the save_lattice command. However, in the new lattice file generated, the PHASE_REFERENCEs of RFCA elements are some very large integers like 9223372036854775807. When I use this lattice for la...
- 08 Feb 2020, 00:17
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: Some mechanism to rotate a ring lattice
- Replies: 3
- Views: 15531
Some mechanism to rotate a ring lattice
Hi Michael, Normally people want to maintain a single lattice file with a specified starting point. However, for some applications, for example injection and extraction simulations, as well as local momentum aperture simulations, one needs to rotate the lattice and start tracking from a different el...
- 02 Feb 2020, 23:17
- Forum: Parallel Elegant
- Topic: Inconsistence in particleID generated with bunched_beam using Elegant and Pelegant
- Replies: 1
- Views: 11229
Inconsistence in particleID generated with bunched_beam using Elegant and Pelegant
Hi Michael, As shown in the attached example, I attempted to use the first_is_fiducial mode in run_control and bunched_beam, to generate a first beam with a single particle for fiducialization and then track the second beam with the desired beam distribution. If I execute Elegant, the particleIDs of...