Search found 371 matches
- 17 Mar 2009, 10:45
- Forum: Parallel Elegant
- Topic: mpi/parallel version of elegant
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8517
Re: mpi/parallel version of elegant
We don't post binary Pelegant for download because there are too many variables that would lead to needing to post many many versions. Variables include: Version of Linux (this can be mitigated by building statically) Version of MPI: (we prefer MPICH2 or MVAPICH2) Once built against a version of MPI...
- 11 Feb 2009, 15:33
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: compile SDDS as SHARED_LIBRARIES on Debian X64
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5622
Re: compile SDDS as SHARED_LIBRARIES on Debian X64
I found what is the problem now. The CONFIG_SITE.linux-x86_64.linux-x86_64 is missed under configure/os/. But I still wonder why the static compile passed without it for a x64 machine. The rules for the static build are special in this directory. Statically linking these libraries to sddsplot will ...
- 11 Feb 2009, 15:29
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: compile SDDS as SHARED_LIBRARIES on Debian X64
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5622
Re: compile SDDS as SHARED_LIBRARIES on Debian X64
It looks like our epics.extensions.configure.tar.gz is pretty old and doesn't contain support for linux-x86_64. Did you get your build rules from another location or are you using the ones we supplied? I just updated epics.extensions.configure.tar.gz and oag.apps.configure.tar.gz on our web site to ...
- 11 Feb 2009, 14:27
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: compile SDDS as SHARED_LIBRARIES on Debian X64
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5622
Re: compile SDDS as SHARED_LIBRARIES on Debian X64
Well the first question is do you have /usr/lib64/libXaw.so or /usr/lib64/libXaw.a installed? Usually if it finds those it won't go looking in ../../../../../lib/linux-x86_64 You can change where it looks by editing epics/extensions/configure/os/CONFIG_SITE.linux-x86_64.linux-x86_64 and changing the...
Re: 2D Array
I fixed the problem. It turns out that there was no problem from having a very long command line like I thought. However I did have to make a change to plaindata2sdds to accept lines 10 times longer than before. You were just over the limit and I am surprised it worked at all for Mike. I also had to...
Re: 2D Array
There appears to be two problems. First the plaindata2sdds command is too long for Windows to handle. I think I have found a workaround for this. Second the plaindata2sdds is not working on Windows with text files that have very long lines. I am still trying to figure out why this is happening. Once...
- 16 Jan 2009, 15:12
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Orbit response matrix bug in elegant 20.0
- Replies: 13
- Views: 15185
Re: Orbit response matrix bug in elegant 20.0
The fix has been posted on the software download page. All the releases with the January 16th date contain the fix.
- 02 Sep 2008, 16:33
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: algebraic sddsprocess
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7621
Re: algebraic sddsprocess
I fixed the problem with negative numbers.
I also added some of the missing functions such as abs, sinh, cosh and a few others.
This will go out with the next release.
I also added some of the missing functions such as abs, sinh, cosh and a few others.
This will go out with the next release.
- 02 Sep 2008, 16:15
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: algebraic sddsprocess crash
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2323
Re: algebraic sddsprocess crash
I could not recreate the problem. I have windows XP and from the command line I ran:
This did not produce an error. I also tried other variations without seeing the error.
Code: Select all
sddsprocess input.sdds output.sdds "-define=col,x,11111*(1 + 1)/1 - 11111*(1 + 1)/1 + 11111*(1*1*1 - 111111)/(1+1) ,algebraic"
- 02 Sep 2008, 11:10
- Forum: Parallel Elegant
- Topic: operating system for pelegant
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6384
Re: operating system for pelegant
Pelegant is included with the elegant installation package for Windows. I have gotten it to run on my dual core laptop with MPICH2.