Thank you. I already email to you.michael_borland wrote:The problem is more likely to be in the .lte file. You can email it to me (borland at aps.anl.gov) if you don't want to post it.
Things to check are a sufficient number of kicks (N_KICKS parameter) on KQUAD and CSBEND elements.
--michael
Search found 33 matches
- 22 Nov 2017, 13:44
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: An interesting problem in a tune footprint of FMA
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15106
Re: An interesting problem in a tune footprint of FMA
- 22 Nov 2017, 13:16
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: An interesting problem in a tune footprint of FMA
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15106
Re: An interesting problem in a tune footprint of FMA
HI Michael
ele file was attached already as the first attached file. 'da_fma.ele'
I modified my question topics
ele file was attached already as the first attached file. 'da_fma.ele'
I modified my question topics
- 22 Nov 2017, 11:58
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: An interesting problem in a tune footprint of FMA
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15106
Re: An interesting problem in a tune footprint of FMA
And I checked the .twi file also.
the nux and nuy are .22 and .16.
the nux and nuy are .22 and .16.
- 22 Nov 2017, 11:41
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: An interesting problem in a tune footprint of FMA
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15106
An interesting problem in a tune footprint of FMA
Hi michael, A result of the tune footprint of FMA is shown in fma2216.png. The tune of the lattice is (.22, .16), But the top in the tune footprint plot is not. the top in the tune footprint is like (.204, .163). fma2216.png Another result plot is made by LEGO. LEGO result.png I changed several num...
- 13 Apr 2017, 09:29
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: High-resolution dynamic aperture
- Replies: 11
- Views: 69845
Re: High-resolution dynamic aperture
Hi wguo, Could you attach an example with multipole errors of the dipoles. Thank you. Guohui There is a way to add multipole errors for the dipoles--by using the MULT element. It can be used as a zero length kick element. Even though dipole magnets might be long , the multipoles are really generated...
- 26 Jan 2017, 09:25
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: Dynamic aperture scan in x direction with a y offset
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18831
Re: Dynamic aperture scan in x direction with a y offset
Guohui, So centroid[0] means x, centroid[1] means x', centroid[2] means y, centroid[3] means y', centroid[4] means t, centroid[5] means p. if we want a centroid offset of x = 0.001 m and y = 0.001 m , we should write : centroid[0, 2] ={1e-3, 1e-3}. Is it right? That's not quite right. centroid[4] i...
- 25 Jan 2017, 13:59
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: Dynamic aperture scan in x direction with a y offset
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18831
Re: Dynamic aperture scan in x direction with a y offset
Guohui, And what's the meaning of ' centroid[2] = 1e-3 ' ? a y offset=0.001 m ? In your definition of centroid, it is double centroid[6] = {0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0}; And I guess {0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0} is values in (x, x’, y, y’, t, p) Is it right? Yes, that's all correct, except centro...
- 25 Jan 2017, 10:42
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: Dynamic aperture scan in x direction with a y offset
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18831
Re: Dynamic aperture scan in x direction with a y offset
Guohui, If I understand correctly, you want to set the initial y coordinate to a fixed value and scan the x coordinate to find the aperture. You can do this by simply creating a line of particles in phase space, e.g., &bunched_beam n_particles_per_bunch = 100, bunch = %s.bun, ! 20mm horizontal size...
- 25 Jan 2017, 10:39
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: Dynamic aperture scan in x direction with a y offset
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18831
- 24 Jan 2017, 16:37
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: Dynamic aperture scan in x direction with a y offset
- Replies: 7
- Views: 18831
Dynamic aperture scan in x direction with a y offset
Hello, Michael, and other experts, Usually we make dynamic aperture line survey as shown in follow figure. DAline-survey.jpg And we can use like follow words to get the dynamic aperture for the line (X= n*sigma_x, Y=n*sigma_y), (X= -n*sigma_x, Y=n*sigma_y) and (X= 0*sigma_x, Y=n*sigma_y). &find_aper...