Search found 85 matches
- 19 May 2010, 12:40
- Forum: General
- Topic: sdds command help
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2032
sdds command help
Hi, I have an SDDS file (attached) in which contains a column of MAL.DP and betaxFinal values (among other things). What I would like to do is calculate (betaxFinal-betaxFinal0)/betaxFinal0 where betaxFinal is the value corresponding to MAL.DP being zero. Just wondering if there is a way to do that ...
- 05 May 2010, 12:23
- Forum: Optimization and Matching
- Topic: Changing a parameter for an element not in beamline
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7154
Re: Changing a parameter for an element not in beamline
Michael,
I was making a mistake on my end. It works now.
Thanks!
chris
I was making a mistake on my end. It works now.
Thanks!
chris
- 05 May 2010, 11:00
- Forum: Optimization and Matching
- Topic: Changing a parameter for an element not in beamline
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7154
Re: Changing a parameter for an element not in beamline
Michael,
I do use Windows. When I try to run the alter_elements commands you provided, I get an "Error: no matches for Q2" message. Is this consistent with the error you were expecting for someone running Windows?
--chris
I do use Windows. When I try to run the alter_elements commands you provided, I get an "Error: no matches for Q2" message. Is this consistent with the error you were expecting for someone running Windows?
--chris
- 04 May 2010, 12:22
- Forum: Optimization and Matching
- Topic: Changing a parameter for an element not in beamline
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7154
Changing a parameter for an element not in beamline
Hi, Is there a way to change a parameter for an element not defined in the beamline (optimization_covariable doesn't work)? E.g. cell1 = line(b1, d1, q1, d1, b2) cell2 = line(b1, d1, q2, d1, b2) I want to optimize cell1 using q1 but also want q2 to take on that value as well. Sure, I can just copy a...
- 19 Feb 2010, 10:25
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: EMATRIX - third order
- Replies: 3
- Views: 17835
Re: EMATRIX - third order
Michael, So to implement a third-order transformation I can write the following commands in a script and get the desired result. I know you can call scripts from within Elegant, but when I try to use these command lines, Elegant doesn't run and complains of "get_param_name(): no parameter found in s...
- 09 Sep 2009, 09:11
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: KQUSE in magnet layout
- Replies: 3
- Views: 17050
KQUSE in magnet layout
Hi,
It appears that a KQUSE element is not represented in the magnet layout when it is plotted. It would be nice to have it visible.
--chris
It appears that a KQUSE element is not represented in the magnet layout when it is plotted. It would be nice to have it visible.
--chris
- 09 Sep 2009, 07:23
- Forum: Linac Tracking
- Topic: Energy loss due to CSR
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4257
Energy loss due to CSR
Hi,
Is there a preferred method for monitoring the energy loss due to CSR through a chicane? Thanks.
--chris
Is there a preferred method for monitoring the energy loss due to CSR through a chicane? Thanks.
--chris
- 26 Aug 2009, 09:29
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: EMATRIX - third order
- Replies: 3
- Views: 17835
EMATRIX - third order
It would be nice if EMATRIX could provide third order terms (e.g. U5666). Is there a quick and dirty way that I could implement that at present? Thanks.
- 26 Aug 2009, 07:02
- Forum: General
- Topic: Cavity Phase
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1301
Cavity Phase
Hi,
I have a linac comprised of a number of cavities. I would like to vary the phase at which these are run. Is there a way I can define a single phase variable in the lattice file and change one number rather than many 10s of cavities individually?
Thanks,
chris
I have a linac comprised of a number of cavities. I would like to vary the phase at which these are run. Is there a way I can define a single phase variable in the lattice file and change one number rather than many 10s of cavities individually?
Thanks,
chris
- 19 Aug 2009, 08:42
- Forum: General
- Topic: Matrix elements
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1556
Re: Matrix elements
Fantastic! For some reason I had been using printout="%s.mpr" rather than SDDS_output. Thanks.