All,
Is there a way to vary a parameter on a turn-by-turn basis in a ring? (e.g. changing the strength of a quadruple as a function of pass number). I thought vary_element could do that but it seems not to be the case. Thank you, -- Philippe.
Search found 79 matches
- 25 Aug 2021, 22:18
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: pass number as an argument for SCRIPT
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1561
- 08 Nov 2020, 19:09
- Forum: Linac Tracking
- Topic: analyzing WATCH data on the fly during fitting
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6319
Re: analyzing WATCH data on the fly during fitting
All,
I actually retract my question! It turns out I was doing something wrong and runing the sdds_beams between fitting iteration and loading the output of the ttracking for next fitting iteration does work. My apologies. -- Philippe.
I actually retract my question! It turns out I was doing something wrong and runing the sdds_beams between fitting iteration and loading the output of the ttracking for next fitting iteration does work. My apologies. -- Philippe.
- 06 Nov 2020, 08:13
- Forum: Linac Tracking
- Topic: analyzing WATCH data on the fly during fitting
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6319
analyzing WATCH data on the fly during fitting
All, Is there a way, when performing multiple fits sequence and saving lattice in between, to access the output particle distribution for the next fitting step. Namely, I have an incoming beam with strong coupling (so that the Courant-Snyder parameters are not meaninful). I use skew-quadrupole magne...
- 29 Jul 2020, 11:24
- Forum: Linac Tracking
- Topic: n_bins in WAKE element
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6518
Re: n_bins in WAKE element
All, To further comment on Wei Hou's post, is there a way to dump the binned current distribution being used by ELEGANT in the wakefield calculation? Such a feature would be very helpful to have especially when the number of bins is automatically set by ELEGANT. This would also give an idea of how t...
- 01 Jul 2020, 23:11
- Forum: General
- Topic: saving trajectory associated with macroparticle(s)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4510
Re: saving trajectory associated with macroparticle(s)
Michael,
Thank you very much for the suggestion. All the best, -- Philippe.
Thank you very much for the suggestion. All the best, -- Philippe.
- 16 Jun 2020, 05:45
- Forum: General
- Topic: saving trajectory associated with macroparticle(s)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4510
saving trajectory associated with macroparticle(s)
Hello,
Is there a way in ELEGANT to save the trajectory of a few macroparticles associated with a bunch while tracking the entire bunch? Thank you, -- Philippe.
Is there a way in ELEGANT to save the trajectory of a few macroparticles associated with a bunch while tracking the entire bunch? Thank you, -- Philippe.
- 24 Mar 2020, 08:48
- Forum: Linac Tracking
- Topic: changing RCOL parameter with alter_elements command
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4356
changing RCOL parameter with alter_elements command
Hi, I have a lattice file with a collimator defined as VS: rcol, XMAX=0.0001 in my .ele file I try to change XMAX via the alter command &alter_elements name = VS, item = "xmax" value = 0.001 &end and got the error message "Error: element VS does not have parameter xmax". I have vainly tried various ...
- 16 May 2018, 04:39
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: rf_setup return <0 values for Ss & Sdelta
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3260
Re: rf_setup return <0 values for Ss & Sdelta
Michael,
Thank you. The signs are fixed but I am still just confused by the meaning of Sz0 and Sdelta0 are these the expected equilibrium bunch length and relative energy spread? Thank you, -- Philippe.
Thank you. The signs are fixed but I am still just confused by the meaning of Sz0 and Sdelta0 are these the expected equilibrium bunch length and relative energy spread? Thank you, -- Philippe.
- 18 Apr 2018, 16:07
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: rf_setup return <0 values for Ss & Sdelta
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3260
rf_setup return <0 values for Ss & Sdelta
Hello, I was wondering what is the meaning of Ss0 and Sdelta0 and how they are computed in rf_setup. For the example attached I am puzzled as the rf_setup returns negative values for these two variables. Also, I am surprised by the magnitude of Sdelta [O(10**-10)] assuming there is just an issue wit...
- 16 Feb 2018, 07:33
- Forum: Linac Tracking
- Topic: stupakov option in CSRDRIFT
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3206
stupakov option in CSRDRIFT
Hello, In a CSRDRIFT located just downstream of the four )last) bend of a standard chicane, I noticed that the energy spread continuously increases with the stupackov=1 option (i.e. it does not seem to taper off). In fact, arbitrarily increasing the drift length results in a larger energy spread (if...