Same problem with bunch file
touschekScatteringOut-002.bun
Search found 24 matches
- 03 Feb 2023, 15:50
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: SDDS5 and SDDSjava from sources
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6632
- 03 Feb 2023, 12:12
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: SDDS5 and SDDSjava from sources
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6632
Re: SDDS5 and SDDSjava from sources
I have a newer version of the SDDSjava that I will try to post to the website today. A workaround till then would be to run sddscast to recast any long64 or longdouble columns and parameters in the SDDS file to long and double. This will reset the version level to 3 or lower. Thanks it works with s...
- 14 Mar 2022, 02:56
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: dipole fringe field
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6070
Re: dipole fringe field
Thanks
- 06 Mar 2022, 04:48
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: dipole fringe field
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6070
dipole fringe field
Dear All, Concerning the setting of the dipole fringe field, I feel a little confused with the documentation. The doc reads that EDGE_ORDER is ignored for EDGE1_EFFECTS = 3 or 4. This is not the case. - it seems that that EDGEORDER need to be set to at least 2 in order to profit from the options EDG...
- 14 Jan 2022, 01:41
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: tuneshift with energy: tracking versus using twissparameters
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6277
Re: tuneshift with energy: tracking versus using twissparameters
Finally I have got the point, looking directly at the phase space.
The RF cavity was defined twice.
The tracking was performed in 6D with a cavity instead of 4D.
The RF cavity was defined twice.
The tracking was performed in 6D with a cavity instead of 4D.
- 14 Jan 2022, 01:10
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: tuneshift with energy: tracking versus using twissparameters
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6277
Re: tuneshift with energy: tracking versus using twissparameters
Dear Michael, Thank you for the suggestion. I already did some studies playing with the number of slices and the integrator order. There is no major effect. The converge is slightly improved but at the margin. Frequency map are very similar. I post for you information the tune shift by tracking with...
- 12 Jan 2022, 09:28
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: tuneshift with energy: tracking versus using twissparameters
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6277
Re: tuneshift with energy: tracking versus using twissparameters
Somehow, I was not able to join the script in the previous post.
by tracking using Michael script for the variation of the Twiss parameter with energy.
by tracking using Michael script for the variation of the Twiss parameter with energy.
- 12 Jan 2022, 09:21
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: tuneshift with energy: tracking versus using twissparameters
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6277
tuneshift with energy: tracking versus using twissparameters
Dear All, When I compute the tune shift with energy by tracking I am not able to reproduce the results obtained using the variation of the twiss parameter with energy I have joined two scripts: offMomentumTwiss.tgz: Twiss parameters with energy (from Michael) runScan collateScan nux_vs_energy.png nu...
- 09 Jan 2022, 17:52
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: frequency_map around closed orbit
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5446
Re: frequency_map around closed orbit
Thanks, this is really helping.
Being guided helps a lot to learn ELEGANT and SDDS routines.
Being guided helps a lot to learn ELEGANT and SDDS routines.
- 08 Jan 2022, 18:10
- Forum: General
- Topic: tuneshift with energy using Pelegant
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4896
tuneshift with energy using Pelegant
Dear All, I would like to compute the tuneshift with energy for case of a storage ring. The computation is for a single particle. Is there a way to compute using parallel computation. Let us say I do track over 10000 turns, for 100 energy offset. Using 100 cores, each core do the computation for an ...