Search found 2010 matches
- 18 Aug 2025, 11:07
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: intrabeam scattering with IBSCATTER
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17300
Re: intrabeam scattering with IBSCATTER
Tiansk, I don't think transforming to a round beam addresses the fundamental issue with the smooth=0 simulation, namely, that it attempts to model (x', y', delta) scattering from a section of a beamline with kicks at a particular location. The right way to address this is to accumulate a scattering ...
- 14 Aug 2025, 16:18
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: Error in calculating dynamic aperture in presence of
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5015
Re: Error in calculating dynamic aperture in presence of
I downloaded your files and they work without errors. Perhaps try the latest version of the code?
--Michael
--Michael
- 14 Aug 2025, 13:42
- Forum: Linac Tracking
- Topic: Can Elegant perform 3D field calculations?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9254
Re: Can Elegant perform 3D field calculations?
Zhenbiao, Elegant does not have that capability. There are some similar capabilities that might get you some of what you want: 1. RFTMEZ0 allows simulating a TM-mode rf cavity specified by the on-axis Ez field. 2. SHRFDF allows simulating a deflecting cavity using space harmonics. 3. SCRIPT allows i...
- 14 Aug 2025, 13:34
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: intrabeam scattering with IBSCATTER
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17300
Re: intrabeam scattering with IBSCATTER
Tiansk,
Could you provide your input files so I can check the results?
In general, I recommend using smooth=1 because otherwise you inject additional noise into the simulations.
--Michael
Could you provide your input files so I can check the results?
In general, I recommend using smooth=1 because otherwise you inject additional noise into the simulations.
--Michael
- 14 Aug 2025, 10:08
- Forum: Linac Tracking
- Topic: BPM errors in trajectory correction simulations
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7543
Re: BPM errors in trajectory correction simulations
Zhenbiao, Operationally, the way to handle this is to perform beam-based-alignment (BBA) so that you know the BPM offsets relative to nearby quadrupoles. In a simulation, you can mock this up by assuming that the BPM offsets are small. How small is determined by the anticipated accuracy of the BBA. ...
- 27 Jun 2025, 14:37
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: Version 2025.2 released
- Replies: 0
- Views: 13361
Version 2025.2 released
Version 2025.2 has been released. It features several bug fixes and some new features. Details are in the manual.
--Michael
--Michael
- 27 Jun 2025, 14:37
- Forum: General
- Topic: Version 2025.2 released
- Replies: 0
- Views: 13388
Version 2025.2 released
Version 2025.2 has been released. It features several bug fixes and some new features. Details are in the manual.
--Michael
--Michael
- 13 May 2025, 14:56
- Forum: Optimization and Matching
- Topic: Multi-objective direct optimization of DA and MA
- Replies: 9
- Views: 14315
Re: Multi-objective direct optimization of DA and MA
Monika,
I don't see anything obviously wrong with the processed file. Can you upload the input file you are using with geneticOptimizer?
--Michael
I don't see anything obviously wrong with the processed file. Can you upload the input file you are using with geneticOptimizer?
--Michael
- 07 May 2025, 14:46
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: rf_setup is broken in 2025.1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6802
Re: rf_setup is broken in 2025.1
Mikhail,
This bug was introduced when I refined the calculation of radiation integrals to better include orbit effects. The fix was pretty simple, see attached.
Thanks for the bug report.
--Michael
This bug was introduced when I refined the calculation of radiation integrals to better include orbit effects. The fix was pretty simple, see attached.
Thanks for the bug report.
--Michael
- 06 May 2025, 23:46
- Forum: Bugs
- Topic: rf_setup is broken in 2025.1
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6802
Re: rf_setup is broken in 2025.1
Mikhail,
The problem is caused by dipole magnet called R.MB12, which has ANGLE=0. I'm not sure why it is a problem now and not in the previous version, but I'll find a solution now that I can see it.
--Michael
The problem is caused by dipole magnet called R.MB12, which has ANGLE=0. I'm not sure why it is a problem now and not in the previous version, but I'll find a solution now that I can see it.
--Michael