Search found 68 matches
- 17 Mar 2023, 09:01
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: static compilation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 72
Re: static compilation
Dear Soliday, thank you for your help. LD_LIBRARY_PATH did not work in our case, but, we loaded the missing libraries through an available module (in our case, an Anaconda module). I still wonder if elegant and Pelegant could be created in a static build. But, for the moment this issue has been solv...
- 09 Mar 2023, 12:08
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: sddspseudoinverse path to lapack and blas libs
- Replies: 5
- Views: 82
Re: sddspseudoinverse path to lapack and blas libs
Thank you, it went a little bit further, now I see : make[2]: *** [../../../../../../base/configure/RULES_BUILD:259: matrix.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/ccc/work/cont003/soleil/blancoor/public/progs/elegant.2023.1.0/elegant_compilation/epics/extensions/src/SDDS/SDDSaps/pseudoInverse/O.lin...
- 09 Mar 2023, 09:16
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: sddspseudoinverse path to lapack and blas libs
- Replies: 5
- Views: 82
Re: sddspseudoinverse path to lapack and blas libs
Dear Soliday, thank you. The compilation moved a little bit forward. Now I'm getting this error : make[2]: *** No rule to make target '../../../../../lib/linux-x86_64/liblapack.a', needed by 'sddspseudoinverse'. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory '/ccc/work/cont003/soleil/blancoor/public/progs/elegant...
- 09 Mar 2023, 03:32
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: touschek_scatter output including element name
- Replies: 0
- Views: 28
touschek_scatter output including element name
Dear all, the function touschek_scatter allows to split the output in several files with an index taken from an inner counter. This works well if all touschek scattering elements have the same name, therefore, the counter and the output index are the same. However, I wonder if it is possible to use ...
- 08 Mar 2023, 11:19
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: static compilation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 72
Re: static compilation
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffdd21df000) libgsl.so.0 => /lib64/libgsl.so.0 (0x00007f3c107f4000) libgslcblas.so.0 => /lib64/libgslcblas.so.0 (0x00007f3c105b7000) libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007f3c103a1000) liblapack.so.3 => not found libblas.so.3 => not found libgfortran.so.3 => /lib64/libgfor...
- 08 Mar 2023, 05:53
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: Compilation with epics base 7
- Replies: 11
- Views: 1060
Re: Compilation with epics base 7
Dear Soliday,
I have compiled from sources epics 7.07 and elegant 2023.1.0 without any problems; I no longer need to add :
line #include "SDDS.h" into oag/apps/src/utils/tools/carriageReturn2newline.c
This is solved from my side. Thank you again.
I have compiled from sources epics 7.07 and elegant 2023.1.0 without any problems; I no longer need to add :
line #include "SDDS.h" into oag/apps/src/utils/tools/carriageReturn2newline.c
This is solved from my side. Thank you again.
- 08 Mar 2023, 05:47
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: static compilation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 72
static compilation
Dear all, I have compiled elegant successfully in the login node of a server, however, when using elegant in other nodes through slurm there are several libraries that are not installed, for example: tcl-8.5.13-8.el7.x86_64 package wget is not installed subversion-1.7.14-14.el7.x86_64 gzip-1.5-10.el...
- 08 Mar 2023, 05:22
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: sddspseudoinverse path to lapack and blas libs
- Replies: 5
- Views: 82
sddspseudoinverse path to lapack and blas libs
Dear all, I am compiling elegant in a server with a non-standard installation of libraries. I have added the path to lapack using OPT_CFLAGS and OPT_CXXFLAGS in epics/base/configure/CONFIG as follows : #orblancog: inserting my vars CROSS_COMPILER_TARGET_ARCHS= SHARED_LIBRARIES=NO OPT_CFLAGS_YES += -...
- 03 Mar 2023, 04:48
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: tcl.h in Ubuntu 2022
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1021
Re: tcl.h in Ubuntu 2022
Dear Soliday,
it works ! Thank you very much.
it works ! Thank you very much.
- 02 Mar 2023, 11:40
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: tcl.h in Ubuntu 2022
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1021
Re: tcl.h in Ubuntu 2022
Dear Soliday, you were right, there was a problem while building. After several trials I found out that the compilation sequence was different to the one suggested with the flag MPI=1 , and the order was important. Now elegant and Pelegant work. I, however, have now another issue with tcl. I get the...