Search found 74 matches
- 07 Oct 2024, 05:23
- Forum: General
- Topic: Sign of summation in second order RDTs wrt sextupoles
- Replies: 0
- Views: 342
Sign of summation in second order RDTs wrt sextupoles
Dear all, I have a doubt about the summation used in the calculation of the second order rdts with respect to sextupoles. I see that in the elegant file 'twiss.cc' line 4997 the sign of the sum is written as termSign = SIGN(ed[iE].s - ed[jE].s); which is negative for j>i, being j downstream wrt to i...
- 19 Aug 2024, 06:56
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: SDDS source compilation in Debian
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4484
Re: SDDS source compilation in Debian
Dear Soliday,
thank you for your help. I finally suceed compiling all except oag/apps/src/utils because of the missing gsl library I mentioned before.
This discussion could be closed.
Best regards,
o
thank you for your help. I finally suceed compiling all except oag/apps/src/utils because of the missing gsl library I mentioned before.
This discussion could be closed.
Best regards,
o
- 24 Apr 2024, 06:14
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: SDDS source compilation in Debian
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4484
Re: SDDS source compilation in Debian
Dear Soliday,
few years ago I wanted to have sddsedit working on linux and in order to compile it I needed the whole epics base.
This might indeed not longer be the case, I will try without epics and with the new epics base on your link.
few years ago I wanted to have sddsedit working on linux and in order to compile it I needed the whole epics base.
This might indeed not longer be the case, I will try without epics and with the new epics base on your link.
- 23 Apr 2024, 11:20
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: SDDS source compilation in Debian
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4484
Re: SDDS source compilation in Debian
Dear Soliday, it was my mistake. I was missing the epics.base.configure file. Now I have it and the compilation stops at cadef.h. Do you have any suggestion ? make[1]: Entering directory '/home/oblanco/Documents/public/progs/elegant/2023.4/elegant_compilation/epics/extensions/src/oagca/O.linux-x86_6...
- 23 Apr 2024, 03:21
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: SDDS source compilation in Debian
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4484
Re: SDDS source compilation in Debian
Dear Soliday,
alright. It might be a component in epics base that I compiled without knowing it was not necessary just because it is in the epics base Makefile. I will try to do it with the epics version distributed with elegant.
Best regards,
o
alright. It might be a component in epics base that I compiled without knowing it was not necessary just because it is in the epics base Makefile. I will try to do it with the epics version distributed with elegant.
Best regards,
o
- 12 Apr 2024, 04:49
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: SDDS source compilation in Debian
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4484
SDDS source compilation in Debian
Dear all, I've been trying to compile the SDDS tools using SDDSbase 7.0.8 on a Debian 12 machine and I get the following error. Is there any variable that should be configured differently on Debian? ... Installing script ../../../../bin/linux-x86_64/hpVecRestore Installing script ../../../../bin/lin...
- 17 Mar 2023, 09:01
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: static compilation
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8653
Re: static compilation
Dear Soliday, thank you for your help. LD_LIBRARY_PATH did not work in our case, but, we loaded the missing libraries through an available module (in our case, an Anaconda module). I still wonder if elegant and Pelegant could be created in a static build. But, for the moment this issue has been solv...
- 09 Mar 2023, 12:08
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: sddspseudoinverse path to lapack and blas libs
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5328
Re: sddspseudoinverse path to lapack and blas libs
Thank you, it went a little bit further, now I see : make[2]: *** [../../../../../../base/configure/RULES_BUILD:259: matrix.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/ccc/work/cont003/soleil/blancoor/public/progs/elegant.2023.1.0/elegant_compilation/epics/extensions/src/SDDS/SDDSaps/pseudoInverse/O.lin...
- 09 Mar 2023, 09:16
- Forum: Installation
- Topic: sddspseudoinverse path to lapack and blas libs
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5328
Re: sddspseudoinverse path to lapack and blas libs
Dear Soliday, thank you. The compilation moved a little bit forward. Now I'm getting this error : make[2]: *** No rule to make target '../../../../../lib/linux-x86_64/liblapack.a', needed by 'sddspseudoinverse'. Stop. make[2]: Leaving directory '/ccc/work/cont003/soleil/blancoor/public/progs/elegant...
- 09 Mar 2023, 03:32
- Forum: Feature Requests
- Topic: touschek_scatter output including element name
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7291
touschek_scatter output including element name
Dear all, the function touschek_scatter allows to split the output in several files with an index taken from an inner counter. This works well if all touschek scattering elements have the same name, therefore, the counter and the output index are the same. However, I wonder if it is possible to use ...