Dear Michael,
I wanted to calculate touschek lifetime in the presence of an Id in my ring. While I wanted to calculate momentum aperture I got an error.
Error: No survivor found for initial scan for W0 #1 at s=0.000000e+00m
can you take a look to my files?
Many thanks in advance,
Samira
Search found 23 matches
- 04 Jul 2022, 03:37
- Forum: Momentum Aperture
- Topic: Lifetime calculation with an ID in the ring
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3598
- 24 Mar 2022, 04:08
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: FM
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2611
Re: FM
Dear Michael,
I had a basic question.
Concerning frequency map analysis, when do we introduce these parameters: delta_min, delta_max and ndelta?
Many thanks for your reply,
Samira
I had a basic question.
Concerning frequency map analysis, when do we introduce these parameters: delta_min, delta_max and ndelta?
Many thanks for your reply,
Samira
- 17 Mar 2022, 02:58
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: Transverse phase space
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2647
Re: Transverse phase space
Dear Michael, Many thanks for reply. I have three questions. I do appreciate if you answer me. Why did you choose line distribution for the beam ? If I set center_on_orbit to zero I don't see any difference in the results. I am going to plot x-y space also, How can I do it? Many thanks and best rega...
- 13 Mar 2022, 07:36
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: Transverse phase space
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2647
Re: Transverse phase space
Here are my files.
I forgot to add them.
I forgot to add them.
- 13 Mar 2022, 06:24
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: Transverse phase space
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2647
Transverse phase space
Dear Michael,
I wanted to plot transverse phase space for 1000 particle tracking. I did track and I introduced watch elements. I need to plot a profile as it is in the attached file.
can you give me some hints?
Best regards,
Samira
I wanted to plot transverse phase space for 1000 particle tracking. I did track and I introduced watch elements. I need to plot a profile as it is in the attached file.
can you give me some hints?
Best regards,
Samira
- 08 Mar 2022, 06:31
- Forum: Ring Tracking
- Topic: FM
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2611
FM
Dear Michael,
I calculated DA and FMA for a bare lattice and lattice with ID.
But I found DA is increased after adding ID! What is wrong in my calculation?
I attached my files. I do appreciate if you can take a look to my files.
Best regards,
Samira
I calculated DA and FMA for a bare lattice and lattice with ID.
But I found DA is increased after adding ID! What is wrong in my calculation?
I attached my files. I do appreciate if you can take a look to my files.
Best regards,
Samira
- 21 Dec 2021, 04:41
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: dynamic aperture after insert a wiggler
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4105
Re: dynamic aperture after insert a wiggler
Dear Michael,
I tried with twice values with Elegant and I got the same chromaticity as yours. but our storage ring is operating at the chromaticity of 6 and 7 with sextupole gradients of 10.98 and -16.57.
I do appreciate all of your answers in this issue,
samira
I tried with twice values with Elegant and I got the same chromaticity as yours. but our storage ring is operating at the chromaticity of 6 and 7 with sextupole gradients of 10.98 and -16.57.
I do appreciate all of your answers in this issue,
samira
- 25 Nov 2021, 07:21
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: dynamic aperture after insert a wiggler
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4105
Re: dynamic aperture after insert a wiggler
Dear Michael,
Here is my lattice with the affect of fringe field.
I do appreciate if you can take a look to my files.
Best regards,
Samira
Here is my lattice with the affect of fringe field.
I do appreciate if you can take a look to my files.
Best regards,
Samira
- 22 Nov 2021, 07:59
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: dynamic aperture after insert a wiggler
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4105
Re: dynamic aperture after insert a wiggler
Dear Michael,
I checked with accelerator toolbox and chromaticity must be +6 and+7. but as you mentioned chromaticity values given by elegant is -4.6.
Do you know the reason?
Many thanks for your answer,
Samira
I checked with accelerator toolbox and chromaticity must be +6 and+7. but as you mentioned chromaticity values given by elegant is -4.6.
Do you know the reason?
Many thanks for your answer,
Samira
- 28 Sep 2021, 04:41
- Forum: Dynamic Aperture
- Topic: dynamic aperture after insert a wiggler
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4105
Re: dynamic aperture after insert a wiggler
Dear Michael,
Concerning my previous post, first I wanted to be sure that I didn't have a mistake.
Then If my run was correct , what can I do to increase dynamic aperture?
Many thanks and best regards,
Samira
Concerning my previous post, first I wanted to be sure that I didn't have a mistake.
Then If my run was correct , what can I do to increase dynamic aperture?
Many thanks and best regards,
Samira