Elegant users forum

Dear Michael,

Many thanks for your kind reply. Yes, it works!

Best regards,
Zhilong

Dear Michael, I find that there will be some significant diference for the matrix of csbend when the bending angle is <0. The situation is: when I look into the matrix of BC21 (attached in the file, it is a csbend element, with bending angle <0) in the beamline of "CHI1", the matrix of BC21 is difer...

Hi Michael, Thanks so much for your kind response, and sorry about the bad expression. For question 1, when set the "DistributionBased=0", I also see the ISR effects is on. I misunderstood that the horizontal kick is off in this setting, and from your answer to question 2, I know that the horizontal...

Hi Michael, I am using elegant to do some single particle tracking for ring recently. When I use the element CSBEND for tracking, I wanna to know how it works for quantum excitation? I read the source code for CSBEND first, and I find that: 1, if we set the flag "distributionBased=0", then it seems ...

Hi Michael,

Thanks!

Zhilong

Hi Michael, This days I face some problem for the n_kicks setting in kquad and csbend element. I am trying to do particle tracking in a ring wirh a extrame short wavelength cavity. The wavelength I use is 30 um. When I try to set the n_kinks in the element of kquad and csbend, the numerical error is...

Hi Michael,

Thanks! With you help, I think I understand the definition now!

Regards,
-Zhilong

Hi Michael, Thanks for your kind reply! Actually I am a little bit confused about the XREFERENCE value in CSBEND. Because according to the source code of csbend.cpp, when we give a value of F1 and XREFERENCE for CSBEND, an additional value of F1/XREFERENCE will be added to b1. So I want to check tha...

Hi Michael, But how to determine the value of X? it is defined as XREFERENCE in the CSBEND element. And by the way, if I want to check the parameters of a dipole after inserting the error, how can i printout this parameters? For example, the skew strength of quadrupole field in the CSBEND. Thanks, -...

Thanks Michael,

I will email the lattice file to you. Yes, the particle number we use is not the real value to get the true touschek loss rate. We just want to get some test first so we use the number so small.

Regards,
Zhilong